The importance of marine wildlife to the ecosystem around Sizewell C cannot be overstated.
Everyone involved in coastal infrastructure projects in the UK has a responsibility to protect and promote such wildlife, using the best options available.
For many species that would be affected by the Sizewell C station, acoustic fish deterrents (AFDs) have proven to be the most effective means to protect against the risk of damage from cooling water intakes.
Among them are sprat and Atlantic herring, the latter a species of commercial and conservation importance.
Sprat inundations have previously put at risk operations at the existing Sizewell plants, while huge sprat shoals have been responsible for plant damage and millions of pounds worth of electricity generation at other East Coast sites such as Dungeness Power Station in Kent.
Minimising risk to fragile fish
Such incidents illustrate the risks of allowing fish to pass through cooling water intakes, not only to the safety of the fish themselves, but also to the station’s ability to maintain operation when needed.
But sprat and herring are classed as hearing specialists and AFDs are proven to prevent them from entering offshore intakes. Trials of an acoustic system installed at Belgium’s Doel nuclear power station showed 95% of herring were deflected, along with 88% of sprat.
Combined, these two species have made up nearly two-thirds of the annual kill by power stations at the Sizewell site, according to reports by the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas).
EDF Energy have argued a fish recovery and return (FRR) system provides sufficient protection, when combined with a low velocity side entry intake. The latter is designed to prevent fish from being sucked in by reducing water speed, but Environment Agency guidance for new nuclear build sites concludes that once-through cooling can only be considered the Best Available Technology where an AFD system is also included.
Sprat and herring are fragile pelagic fish, whose scales easily shed. They very rarely survive passage through an FRR system, making an approach that fails to exclude them inherently flawed and falling short of the high standard of fish protection that is readily achievable
Learn about changes in the fish population at Sizewell C.
Our Latest Sizewell News
Why Fish Clogging Up the Intakes of Nuclear Power Plants is Very Damaging for Both the Environment and the Taxpayer
Nuclear reactors require a lot of cooling – that’s why they are commonly found in coastal areas, where there is an abundance of water to draw in and keep the temperature of the sea at acceptable levels. A side effect of pulling vast quantities of water is the amount of
Sizewell C Consultations Raise Concern Over Fish Protection
The latest consultation on plans for the Sizewell C nuclear power station is underway, but new proposals do not include important measures to protect marine wildlife at the site. Steps intended to mitigate the project’s impact on nearby habitats are among the plans, as well as changes in how materials
Future-proofing fish protection at Sizewell C
A planning application for the Sizewell C nuclear power station has been formally accepted, marking the beginning of a process that could result in a green light within the next year. If approved, construction of the plant on the Suffolk coast is expected to take around 10 years, ultimately generating
The role of Sizewell C in a post-pandemic world
As the UK looks towards a ‘new normal’, pre-pandemic priorities are coming to the fore once more. Job creation will be more important than ever as the country deals with the economic fallout of Covid-19, while renewable energy will continue to be key to environmental goals. A group of 32